Kamis, 13 Maret 2014

# Ebook Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright

Ebook Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright

Beginning with seeing this site, you have tried to begin loving checking out a book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright This is specialized site that offer hundreds compilations of books Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright from whole lots resources. So, you won't be tired more to select the book. Besides, if you also have no time to browse the book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright, just rest when you remain in office and open up the internet browser. You could find this Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright inn this web site by hooking up to the internet.

Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright

Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright



Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright

Ebook Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright

Invest your time even for simply few minutes to read a publication Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright Checking out a publication will certainly never lower and also waste your time to be pointless. Reading, for some folks become a demand that is to do everyday such as hanging out for eating. Now, just what about you? Do you like to review a publication? Now, we will show you a brand-new e-book qualified Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright that can be a new way to explore the expertise. When reviewing this book, you could get one thing to always bear in mind in every reading time, even step by action.

Here, we have countless publication Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright and collections to review. We likewise serve variant types as well as kinds of the publications to browse. The fun e-book, fiction, past history, novel, scientific research, and other kinds of books are readily available right here. As this Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright, it turneds into one of the favored e-book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright collections that we have. This is why you are in the best website to view the outstanding books to possess.

It won't take more time to download this Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright It won't take even more money to print this e-book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright Nowadays, people have actually been so wise to utilize the technology. Why do not you utilize your gadget or various other device to save this downloaded soft file book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright In this manner will certainly let you to consistently be come with by this book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright Of course, it will be the most effective friend if you review this book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright till completed.

Be the first to purchase this e-book now as well as obtain all reasons you should review this Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright Guide Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright is not only for your duties or need in your life. Publications will certainly consistently be a great close friend in whenever you read. Now, let the others learn about this page. You could take the perks as well as discuss it additionally for your pals and individuals around you. By this method, you can actually obtain the definition of this e-book Who Was Jesus?, By N. T. Wright profitably. Exactly what do you consider our concept here?

Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright

Did the historical person Jesus really regard himself as the Son of God? What did Jesus actually stand for? And what are we to make of the early Christian conviction that Jesus physically rose from the dead?

In this book, N. T. Wright considers these and many other questions raised by three controversial books about Jesus: Barbara Thiering's Jesus the Man, A. N. Wilson's Jesus: A Life, and John Shelby Spong's Born of a Woman. While Wright agrees with those authors that the real, historical Jesus has many surprises in store for institutional Christianity, he also presents solid reasons for discounting their arguments, claiming that they "fail to reach anything like the right answer" as to who Jesus really was.

Written from the standpoint of professional biblical scholarship yet assuming no prior knowledge of the subject, Wright's Who Was Jesus? shows convincingly that much can be gained from a rigorous historical assessment of what the Gospels say about Jesus. This is a book to engage skeptics and believers alike.

  • Sales Rank: #45218 in Audible
  • Published on: 2016-01-26
  • Format: Unabridged
  • Original language: English
  • Running time: 272 minutes

Most helpful customer reviews

43 of 46 people found the following review helpful.
A damning critique of some media darlings
By Wayne Symes
At the beginning of the 1990's a media bandwagon around `new' outlooks on the life of Jesus was in full swing. In particular the works of Bishop John Spong (USA), A.N Wilson (UK) and Barbara Thiering (Australia) were given popular acclaim. Wright (a well credentialled New Testament scholar) takes each of these `writers' and shows how flawed their accounts are. He is strong, concise and rightly critical of poor scholarship. While the times that occasioned the book may have passed, the issues remain and Wright's discussion of what we can say about Jesus is very helpful.

31 of 35 people found the following review helpful.
Lemonaide from lemons.
By David Marshall
At first glance, this seems a rather odd book. What is a first-class historian like N. T. Wright doing, refuting the likes of Spong and Thiering? Does one need a bulldozer to squash ants? (Wilson, I personally find more intelligent, and thus perhaps rising to the dignity of being run over.) Yet Wright gives their arguments a fair hearing, then a fair and gentle hanging.

But there seems to be method to Wright's mildness. As an alternative to the fumbling and bumbling of his protagonists, he offers a simple and readable description of who he has found the historical Jesus to be. Their errors prove a useful foil for explaining the methods and conclusions of legitimate New Testament scholarship. Wright's critiques of those with whom he disagrees are always a delight -- he shows a sincere appreciation for what is worthwhile, then refutes errors with wit and the gentle precision that comes of great intellectual power matched to thorough knowledge of the subject.

The subject here is Jesus, a fox in pursuit of whom academic hounds have banged their heads on many trees. Wright rightly follows him to the cross. "The Christian doctrine is all about a different kind of God -- a God who was so different to normal expectations that he could, completely appropriately, become human . . . To say that Jesus is in some sense God is of course to make a startling statement about Jesus. It is also to make a stupendous claim about God."

I think Wright over-emphasizes the genius of Biblical scholarship. He tends to give the impression that nobody knew anything worth knowing about Jesus, until the question was brought to the attention of modern academics. Having read many "Jesus Seminar" books, I think credentialed scholars like Crossan, Borg, Mack, and Pagels, are often as foolish as Wilson -- and less truly knowledgeable about the historical Jesus than the average Pentacostal grandmother.
Wright also knocks C. S. Lewis for his "odd" criticism of the "quest for Jesus" as "the work of the devil," in the Screwtape Letters. Aside from the unfairness of ignoring the humor in a satire, I think the substance of Lewis' arguments, made more seriously in Fernseed and Elephants, is entirely sound, and makes an excellent critique of many recent historical Jesus reconstructions. I think Wright's historical reconstruction, and Lewis' literary critique of shoddy skeptical arguments, complement one another nicely.
In sum, I recommend this book both for people who have been bamboozled by the particular works it refutes, and also as an antidote to recent works of a similar nature, like the Da Vinci Code, Jesus Mysteries, The Jesus Puzzle, or perhaps Elaine Pagel's new book, Beyond Belief. I am working on a book that will combine Wright and Lewis' approaches, to answer recent attacks on the Gospels.

author, Jesus and the Religions of Man /
christthetao@msn.com

18 of 21 people found the following review helpful.
State of the Quest
By Labarum
Each year as we approach Christmas and Easter, we are inevitably greeted at magazine racks by news journals trumpeting the "latest scholarship" on the "historic Jesus". The fact that very little of what appears ever has lasting scholarly value seems to of little concern to the journals in question. The attraction of the sensational and the scandalous governs media coverage in our age and any "scholar" who claims things about Jesus Christ that ordinary Christians would find disturbing is enticing to a cynical media looking for a "story" - even if the views promoted lack any credibility with the vast majority of experts in the field.
N. T. Wright, one of the world's leading biblical scholars, has provided in Who Was Jesus? a potent antidote to the faddish output of several popular characterizations of Jesus making the rounds in press reports at the time it was written. With clarity and power, he destroys the arguments of popular revisionist arguments with comparative ease. By placing Jesus in the proper historical and cultural setting, the pet theories of various contributors to the radical fringe in studies of the historical Jesus are found to owe more to the temperaments and cultural presuppositions of the writers than anything likely to relate to the true life and times of Jesus. As a leading figure in the study into the historical and cultural settings of the New Testament, Wright could never be accused of putting his head in the sand. However, Wright insists an understanding of the complex interplay of cultures in fist century Judea is essential to grasping the true meaning of the New Testament writings,
Wright begins with an overview of the quest among scholars for the historic Jesus. While sympathetic to the goals of many of these investigations, he points out they are often as guided by their own prejudices as many forms of traditional Christian belief. The beliefs of many Christians about Jesus may be distorted at points but they are not without historical basis. Indeed, the beliefs of the Church certainly have a greater correspondence with the historical realities of the time than the pet theories of many revisionists. Wright assures traditional believers that any honest investigation into the Jesus of history should leave them with a more robust faith - not a weaker one.
Wright then turns to the particular projects of three major revisionists: Barbara Thiering, A.N. Wilson, and John Shelby Spong. Rather than dismissing them outright, Wright takes the path of considering their ideas seriously and applying the same critical analysis to them given to any serious scholarly hypothesis. In many ways this proves to be even more devastating, as rather than attempting a knockout blow, Wright counters their arguments with surgical precision and leaves their novelties to die of a thousand cuts. Thiering is particularly skewered as both a proper historical understanding of Judaism at the time and archeological discoveries of the period refute her concept of a coded pesher language in the New Testament. Once Wright is finished, her theories are exposed as little more than figments of a fertile imagination. Of the three, Wright shows the most empathy for Wilson for at least attempting to place Jesus within Judaism, but the rather bland figure from Wilson's account could hardly have been expected to found a movement to concern both Jewish and Roman authorities. Wilson's peculiar explanation of the Easter event (the Apostles mistook James for Jesus) comes in for severe criticism as an ad hoc conjecture giving no likely explanation for subsequent events. Spong is calmly refuted as simply taking part in a discussion over his head. Spong tries to paint the Gospels as an exercise in midrash , but as in Thiering's use of pesher, the description does not meet the reality. Spong simply has no idea what midrash is and misapplies it in an attempt to make the Gospels say something they do not. The critique by Wright in all three cases leaves the respective theories lying in ashes.
Wright finishes with an outline of the major points in an honest evaluation of the historical evidence about Jesus. First, the events chronicled in the Gospels must be understood in the context of a Judaism that had endured the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and their being taken into captivity, the rebuilding of the Temple and Jerusalem under Persian rule, the attempts to Hellenize the Jews under Greek dominance, and the current humiliations of pagan Roman occupation. It was these Jews, looking for the fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies, to which Jesus came. The Gospels themselves must be understood within the literary forms of first century Judea. The language of the New Testament must not be read within a flat literalism but examined within the particular form in question. By moving forwards from first century Judaism and backwards from the Gospel, we are most likely to grasp the true Jesus. Most importantly, Wright sees nothing in such an endeavor to threaten the Jesus of faith. Wright even suggests the New Testament accounts of the resurrection make little sense as a developed tradition - unless it actually happened.
N. T. Wright has issued a challenge to both believers and skeptics alike for a greater appreciation of historical and cultural settings when interpreting the Gospel. Who Was Jesus? is a wonderful introduction to such a study and ideal for anyone looking to grasp the strengths and weaknesses of various theories commonly promoted in the national media. It also may serve as a primer for Wright's own more scholarly work. As a summary of the state (at the time of its writing) of modern scholarship into the historic Jesus, it is highly recommended.

See all 22 customer reviews...

Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright PDF
Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright EPub
Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright Doc
Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright iBooks
Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright rtf
Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright Mobipocket
Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright Kindle

# Ebook Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright Doc

# Ebook Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright Doc

# Ebook Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright Doc
# Ebook Who Was Jesus?, by N. T. Wright Doc

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar